Bottom Accumulation or End of the Bull Market? Three Core Variables at Bitcoin’s Price Crossroads

比特币投资的局限性与更具潜力的股票选择
Published on: Jul 15, 2026
Author: Amy Liu

Recently, Bitcoin’s price has been oscillating within a narrow range near the $65,000 level, and market trading sentiment has sunk into an unusually depressed state. Monitoring data indicates that discussion activity on major social platforms such as X, Reddit, and Telegram has fallen to the second-lowest level since October 2024. In theory, the fading of retail investor attention often implies weakening momentum for chasing gains and panic selling, which opens a window for large investors to reposition before the public eye returns. Beneath the market’s apparent calm, however, two sharply divergent investment strategies are locked in fierce contention. A genuine turnaround at the current stage still requires confirmation that bottom-fishing buying power can effectively absorb panic-induced sell pressure.

Underground Capital Flows and Supply-Demand Imbalance

The deeper structure of capital flows reveals the severity of the current supply-demand contradiction. According to CryptoQuant data, whale cohorts holding between 100 and 1,000 Bitcoin moved as much as $4.3 billion in a single day, with distribution scale proving extraordinarily massive. On the demand side, total inflows into all exchange-traded fund (ETF) products over the same period amounted to only one-twenty-second of that outflow, with institutional purchases far from sufficient to absorb the selling pressure from whales. From a technical indicator standpoint, Bitcoin’s price has failed for five consecutive months to break above two critical recovery thresholds set by Glassnode, namely the short-term holder cost basis of $72,200 and the market real average of $76,600. Daily potential losses for long-term holders reached as high as $280 million, marking the highest level since December 2022, while market panic sentiment continues to spread. At the same time, risk-off sentiment triggered by fluctuations in oil prices has exacerbated market fragility, with Bitcoin’s price movement moving in high sync with other risk assets, and its short-term safe-haven attributes having notably weakened.

Macro Paradox and Institutional Caution

The macro liquidity environment presents a complex set of paradoxical characteristics. On the one hand, the U.S. M2 money supply has climbed to an all-time record of $22.8 trillion, indicating that overall liquidity remains in an expansionary trajectory; on the other hand, the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet size still stands about $2 trillion lower than its peak in 2023, resulting in a persistently tight real-yield environment, leaving Bitcoin caught in the gap between abundant macro liquidity and tightening micro-level funding. Against the backdrop of weak investor interest and sluggish progress in U.S. cryptocurrency legislation, Citibank in July slashed its 12-month price target for Bitcoin from $112,000 to $82,000, and warned that if the global economy slips into recession, the price could even descend to $53,000. This pessimistic forecast reflects institutions’ dual concerns over macro risks and policy uncertainties.

Two Possible Outcomes at the Watershed

The market’s critical line in the days ahead hinges entirely on whether bottom-fishing buying power can effectively absorb the sustained selling pressure. If whale cohorts holding between 100 and 1,000 Bitcoin halt their distribution, and ETF inflows remain positive for several consecutive weeks, Bitcoin (BTC) stands a chance to reclaim the $72,200 cost basis and the $76,600 market average. Conversely, if whale selling persists, ETF flows turn negative, and long-term holder panic fails to subside, the risk of the price breaching the $60,000 threshold will rise markedly. Whether those wallets that quietly entered the market during the calm period can absorb the residual supply from exiting holders will directly determine whether Bitcoin embarks on a new upward cycle or descends into a deeper correction.

Bitcoin Cryptocurrency Financial Service Fintech