1911 Gold Corporation (TSXV: AUMB; OTCQX: AUMBF)
1911 Gold is Manitoba’s Gold Standard - Ready, Permitted and High-Grade 1911 Gold is an Emerging Gold Producer, with Significant Cash Flow Generation and District-Scale Growth Potential
Just as Kevin Warsh was confirmed as the new Federal Reserve Chair by a narrow 54–45 vote and is about to be sworn in this Friday, U.S. inflation data delivered a rude awakening. The April Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 3.8% year-over-year, the highest since May 2023. Even more alarming for policymakers, the Producer Price Index (PPI) surged 6% year-over-year, the largest 12-month increase since December 2022.
Meanwhile, the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield has climbed to around 4.6%, a one-year high. What Warsh inherits is not a smoothly running policy machine, but an inflation bomb that is heating up fast.
Minutes Send Clear Signal: Rate Hike Discussion Already on the Table
The Fed’s latest April meeting minutes show that a majority of participants believed that if inflation persists stubbornly above the 2% target, “some policy firming would likely become appropriate.” Although the meeting ultimately decided to hold rates steady (with the federal funds target range at 3.50%-3.75%), three officials argued for removing language from the post-meeting statement that suggested the central bank’s next move would likely be a rate cut, and one official even dissented in favor of a rate cut — underscoring growing internal divisions. The minutes indicate that, as the Iran war pushes up gasoline prices and tariffs continue to filter through to consumer goods, the Fed has gradually lost patience with inflation. U.S. inflation has not run below the 2% target since 2021, with April CPI accelerating to 3.8% and core CPI rising to 2.8% — inflationary pressures have spilled over from energy into services and core goods categories.
Warsh’s Historically Hawkish Colors Clash with Current Realities
Warsh is no novice. During his previous stint as a Fed Governor from 2006 to 2011, he repeatedly stressed inflation risks, arguing even when unemployment was high and core inflation was running below 2% that keeping policy too easy for too long would erode the central bank’s price credibility. At his April confirmation hearing, he told the Senate Banking Committee: “Congress tasked the Fed with the mission to ensure price stability, without excuse or equivocation, argument or anguish.” He also said inflation “is a choice, and the Fed must take responsibility for it.” Such language stands in stark contrast to the White House’s repeated calls for rate cuts.
However, Warsh’s tone has softened in recent years. He has mentioned that productivity gains from artificial intelligence could create room for looser policy over the long term, and he expressed support for rate cuts at certain points last year. But the data he now faces cannot be ignored: April’s PPI rose 1.4% month-over-month, the largest monthly gain since March 2022; core wholesale prices climbed at a 4.4% annual rate. Real average hourly wages fell on a year-over-year basis for the first time in three years, meaning paychecks have stopped keeping pace with prices. Warsh’s first FOMC meeting under his leadership is scheduled for June 16-17, leaving him very little breathing room.
“Higher for Longer” Returns as Baseline Scenario
The White House, under President Trump, continues to pressure the Fed for rate cuts to boost the economy and reduce interest payments on the national debt, though Trump said this week he would let Warsh act independently on rates. Nevertheless, given Warsh’s historical stance and current data, an immediate rate cut is highly unlikely. A more realistic path is to hold rates steady, or even — if inflation data worsen in the coming months — restarting rate hikes will become a question of “when” rather than “if.” For markets, rate-sensitive sectors such as real estate investment trusts and homebuilders are likely to remain under pressure, while banks and insurers could benefit from a steeper yield curve.
The first major decision Warsh faces may not be whether to cut rates, but rather how to balance disappointing the markets versus disappointing the White House. But one thing is becoming clear: the “higher for longer” narrative has once again become the Fed’s baseline reality.
