SLAM Exploration Ltd. (TSXV: SXL)
‘Exploring for critical elements and precious metals in New Brunswick, Canada.’
Global oil markets are facing a rare supply crisis. The Strait of Hormuz has been closed due to geopolitical conflict in the Middle East, and crude oil production in the Persian Gulf has collapsed by 57% from pre-war levels. Shell CEO Wael Sawan recently issued a stark warning: the world has accumulated a shortage of nearly 1 billion barrels of crude oil, and that number is growing daily.
Goldman Sachs estimates that global inventories are currently being drained at a staggering rate of 11 million to 12 million barrels per day. Even if the conflict ends immediately, restarting shuttered wells in the Persian Gulf could take as long as seven months. This means that high oil prices are not a short-lived spike – they could persist through the remainder of 2026 and possibly extend into 2027.
For investors, the core question follows: Is buying integrated oil majors like Shell at this moment a wise move, or a chase of risk?
Shell’s Positioning: Integrated Major vs. Pure-Play Upstream
In a supply-driven oil price cycle, not all oil stocks benefit equally. Pure-play upstream producers such as Devon Energy and Diamondback Energy have the highest sensitivity to oil prices – for every $1 increase in oil, their earnings leverage is far greater than that of larger companies. But the downside is equally clear: once the conflict eases and oil prices retreat, these stocks tend to fall the hardest.
Shell is an integrated energy major, with operations spanning upstream exploration and production, midstream transport, downstream refining, and retail. This structure provides a natural hedge: upstream operations enjoy the windfall from high oil prices, while downstream refining and chemical businesses may suffer from higher feedstock costs. As a result, Shell’s share price tends to rise less than pure-play upstream names during an oil rally, but it is also more resilient during downturns. For long-term investors unwilling to stomach extreme volatility, integrated majors are a more stable vehicle.
Shell’s Weakness: Dividend History and Balance Sheet
Compared with the other two integrated giants – Chevron and ExxonMobil – Shell has an undeniable historical blemish: during the pandemic in 2020, Shell cut its dividend for the first time since World War II. In contrast, Chevron and ExxonMobil have both maintained decades of uninterrupted dividend growth. For long-term holders whose primary objective is dividend income, this difference is critical.
On the balance sheet front, Chevron and ExxonMobil possess the strongest financial firepower in the industry, allowing them to prudently add debt during oil downturns to sustain dividends and capital spending until the sector recovers. Shell’s debt level is relatively higher, though it has improved significantly in recent years, but it still lags behind the most robust peers. Current dividend yields among the three stand at: Chevron 3.9%, Shell 3.4%, and ExxonMobil 2.8%. Chevron currently leads in both yield and safety.
How Long Will High Oil Prices Last? What the Institutions Are Saying
Goldman Sachs has modeled several scenarios. In its base case – the Strait of Hormuz reopens by the end of June and Persian Gulf production normalises gradually through the year – oil prices are expected to fall below $90 per barrel by the end of 2026 and approach 80 by the end of 2027. In a more adverse scenario – renewed conflict or restart difficulties – crude could remain in triple digits well into early 2027.
Under either scenario, the enormous inventory deficit will take months or even longer to replenish. This means that oil prices through 2026 will most likely stay far above pre-war expectations (Goldman had forecast oil at around $60 by the end of 2026 before the conflict). For energy stocks, this provides a clear earnings tailwind.
Investment Decision: Is Shell Worth Buying?
For short-term traders: Shell is not the best choice. If the sole objective is to capture the leverage effect of rising oil prices, pure-play US domestic producers (which are not directly affected by the Middle East conflict) offer greater upside elasticity.
For long-term, buy-and-hold investors: Shell can be considered, but its relative disadvantages need to be recognised. Among the three integrated majors, Chevron – with its stronger balance sheet, decades of dividend growth, and the current highest yield of 3.9% – is viewed by many institutions as the superior option. Shell does have unique advantages in European natural gas and LNG, and its valuation trades at a discount to its US peers. However, its 2020 dividend cut still gives some conservative investors pause.
Bottom line: The current 1-billion-barrel supply gap provides rare fundamental support for the energy sector. For investors who want to participate in rising oil prices while retaining downside protection, integrated energy majors are a reasonable choice. Within that group, Chevron’s overall quality edges out the competition. Shell is more suitable for those willing to accept slightly higher risk in exchange for potential valuation catch-up. Whichever one you choose, the case for allocating to energy stocks has become significantly stronger in the current macro environment.
